|
|
|
good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
| PerlMonks |
Re: Python OO v Mooseby sundialsvc4 (Monsignor) |
| on Feb 12, 2013 at 19:42 UTC ( #1018435=note: print w/ replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
(Shrug...) The tools are different, that’s all. Remember also that Moose is designed to provide a pragmatically acceptable object-oriented context with regard to a language (Perl) that does not intrinsically have one, whereas the Python features that you describe are native to the (current versions of the) language. Both languages are great. I use both of them all the time. But this is apples vs. oranges. The only directly-comparable relationship that I can think of would be to “the not-here-yet language commonly known as Perl 6.” As things stand here, Moose is doing as well as it can ... which is, pretty well.
In Section
Meditations
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||