Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Python OO v Moose

by sundialsvc4 (Abbot)
on Feb 12, 2013 at 19:42 UTC ( #1018435=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Python OO v Moose

(Shrug...)   The tools are different, that’s all.   Remember also that Moose is designed to provide a pragmatically acceptable object-oriented context with regard to a language (Perl) that does not intrinsically have one, whereas the Python features that you describe are native to the (current versions of the) language.   Both languages are great.   I use both of them all the time.

But this is apples vs. oranges.   The only directly-comparable relationship that I can think of would be to “the not-here-yet language commonly known as Perl 6.”   As things stand here, Moose is doing as well as it can ... which is, pretty well.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1018435]
help
Chatterbox?
[Lady_Aleena]: Would you use a module that is almost 150 characters to type with the use and importing all subroutines?
[LanX]: use module :all ?
[Lady_Aleena]: Lax, that would take it down to a little less than 100 characters. The module name is nearly 80 characters long.
Lady_Aleena has fumble fingers today.
[Lady_Aleena]: Sorry for the name typo LanX.
[LanX]: never lad_ena!
[LanX]: ;)

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (9)
As of 2017-05-24 21:57 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?