Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re: why "link", "rename", but no "unlink" in CORE::?

by Anonymous Monk
on Feb 27, 2013 at 11:48 UTC ( #1020858=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to why "link", "rename", but no "unlink" in CORE::?

I would look at ex::override

  • Comment on Re: why "link", "rename", but no "unlink" in CORE::?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: why "link", "rename", but no "unlink" in CORE::?
by perl-diddler (Hermit) on Feb 27, 2013 at 20:26 UTC
    Indeed.

    That might be a cleaner way to do the same, though not sure if it will solve the problem of allowing a direct call or not until I try it (i.e. if I can't call unlink directly, it might not let me override it either? Dunno).

    Thanks for the tip.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1020858]
help
Chatterbox?
[PriNet]: i guess i'll just have to use two seperate hashes, there are two, but one is larger than the other, and when i reference the smaller one, it holds onto the values that were assigned to the larger hash (the keynames change, but unless i reassign a new valu

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (3)
As of 2017-06-28 03:02 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How many monitors do you use while coding?















    Results (619 votes). Check out past polls.