|
|
|
good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
| PerlMonks |
Re^2: What do you think about "Thank you"-nodes?by Anonymous Monk |
| on Mar 22, 2013 at 22:59 UTC ( #1024990=note: print w/ replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
Ha :) me blind again (got distracted and missed that this was already linked), so to repeat and expand on my previous reply I appreciate genuine thoughtful follow-ups/responses The kind that say thanks, I went with this approach for that reason Or here's the code solution I adapted Or I thought about that, but ... Basically like a real conversation :) I'm not a fan of 30 identical "thanks for your reply/interest", its ok to summarize when publicly addressing groups, you can always use /msg for 30 identical thank you notes But I dislike the rare and disingenuous non-responsive thank-you-then-copy/paste-something-verbatim-again, but I think we can all agree on that
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||