Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Autovivification identification

by gaurav (Acolyte)
on Aug 01, 2013 at 10:18 UTC ( #1047412=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Autovivification identification
in thread Autovivification identification

thanks...I was thinking the same..but was little bit confused..because of amateurishness in Perl

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Autovivification identification
by ww (Archbishop) on Aug 01, 2013 at 10:41 UTC

    "...amateurishness in Perl" or "amateurishness in the observer?"

    A little knowledge is a dangerous thing; so is failure to indent for readability.

      I am very thank full to you,but want to make one thing clear ,that don't have any disrespect for Perl.My intention was same as yours',means I was calling my self, an amateur

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1047412]
help
Chatterbox?
[1nickt]: What do you all think of experimental = refaliasing ? Anyone using it?
[1nickt]: \my %foo = { bar => 1 }; say $foo{bar};

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (6)
As of 2017-11-17 20:36 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    In order to be able to say "I know Perl", you must have:













    Results (272 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?