Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight

Re: Buggy smartmatch on tied array?

by davido (Archbishop)
on Oct 05, 2013 at 16:42 UTC ( #1057048=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Buggy smartmatch on tied array?

I can at least verify that it's an issue on 5.18. And the code looks reasonable to me. Of course on 5.18 I also get:

Smartmatch is experimental at ./ line 4. Smartmatch is experimental at ./ line 6.

You might search the bug queue for issues related to smartmatch to see if it's already been reported. If not, go for it. I think the operator is in a state of flux, but it would be a shame for little things like this to not get fixed if the operator ever has its experimental designation removed again.


Comment on Re: Buggy smartmatch on tied array?
Download Code
Re^2: Buggy smartmatch on tied array?
by ikegami (Pope) on Oct 06, 2013 at 17:50 UTC
    It's probably a trivial thing to fix, and it will be. Smart match is experimental because it has major design issues.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1057048]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (4)
As of 2015-07-05 16:12 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...

    Results (67 votes), past polls