| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
Its hardly sharp; nor cutting; and there was no scorn.
So more a semi-humorous, semi-serious observation that: a) with 8 rules, simple is not so simple; b) maybe those rules could (should) be encapsulated.
Of course, once you decide that simple requires rules; there can be discussion and even disagreement about what the rules should be.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
Its hardly sharp; nor cutting; and there was no scorn. I really meant to link [wikit://sarcasm] as in Insincerely saying something which is the opposite of one's intended meaning, often to emphasize how unbelievable or unlikely it sounds if taken literally, thereby illustrating the obvious nature of one's intended meaning.
I guess there are shades of sarcasm, and I meant light sarcasm ...
Man, words are hard to interpret :)
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
NOT EVEN CLOSE. It would be completely useless, and completely lost on him.
But if it would be; it would be up to tye to point that out; not his lap dog.
YOU really are very bad at this aren't you.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |