Re^5: Is this absurd, or have I not RTFM?

passing DESTROY a new reference to the same object.

Of course it's a new reference. The object only gets destroyed when nothing refers to the object (or when in global destruction), so a reference must be created to pass to DESTROY.

Comment on Re^5: Is this absurd, or have I not RTFM?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Is this absurd, or have I not RTFM? by petermogensen (Sexton) on May 23, 2014 at 08:51 UTC
Yes yes... I know. There's still a calling-DESTORY-twice bug though.	[reply]


Don't ask to ask, just ask
	PerlMonks