good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
Re^3: Can I please have multiple downvotes per (certain monk's) posts.by marinersk (Priest) |
on Jun 21, 2015 at 16:36 UTC ( [id://1131349]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
That is an interesting proposition. We're in a phase of what I might coin the Functional Group Lifecycle where both signal and noise are diminishing, but the signal is falling off more rapidly than the noise due in part to its well-established archive:
Coming up with a mechanism to improve the ability of a reader to distinguish the signal from the noise, rather than try in vain to correct the traffic distribution is, I have to say, a brilliant departure from the oft-failed futile efforts I've seen to date. Proving (to me, anyway), once again, that it is The Conversation which is important, and that it must be encouraged, not discouraged. How we got there, I suppose, is largely a secondary consideration.
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|