Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Do you know where your variables are?
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Unable to front-page [id://1181114]

by LanX (Saint)
on Feb 06, 2017 at 20:53 UTC ( [id://1181210]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Unable to front-page [id://1181114]
in thread Unable to front-page [id://1181114]

I wouldn't say the root cause is found.

Regarding "node history" check the "approval nodelet".

But better don't be too optimistic, imho it doesn't show much more than changes triggered from the approval nodelet.

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
Je suis Charlie!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Unable to front-page [id://1181114]
by kcott (Archbishop) on Feb 06, 2017 at 21:29 UTC

    Thanks for the speedy reply.

    "I wouldn't say the root cause is found."

    That's a fair enough comment. I've <del>eted the word "root" from that sentence.

    I seem to recall that, long ago, I did try that "node history" link on quite a few posts. It always told me:

    "This node has not been edited yet."

    I just tried it again, on one of my nodes that I knew I had edited, and got the same result. It doesn't look like it'll be much good when "considering empty nodes" (as I suggested earlier).

    — Ken

      The edit history includes content edits made to a node by someone exercising janitorial powers, but not by the node's owner.

      It also, currently, shows section changes. It does not show approval changes. (This could, and arguably should, change.)

      The Approval Nodelet can be used to see the current approval status, which is normally all you should need. Just remember to unapprove from a section -- and reload the node a couple times just to make sure, as some caching happens at some level in the stack -- before approving it into a different section.

      I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.

        Thanks for the additional information. That certainly clarifies the meaning of the "This node has not been edited yet." message.

        I have moved a number of unapproved nodes without any problems. I don't have the necessary authority to unapprove a node: if an approved node needing moving, I'd consider it (Edit: move to ...).

        — Ken

      Yes the name is misleading.

      I was also surprised to finally find its purpose.

      Cheers Rolf
      (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
      Je suis Charlie!

        We should probably change that to read This node has not been janited yet. Concurrences?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1181210]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-03-28 14:38 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found