Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Net::SMTP v local MTA

by lhoward (Vicar)
on Jan 12, 2002 at 02:31 UTC ( #138158=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Net::SMTP v local MTA

I've done a good bit of benchmarking of Net::SMTP vs other methods for sending mail, and have found that Net::SMTP (or another SMTP transporter) is almost always the winner. But you can do some things in SMTP that would hurt performance. A few things that could be effecting you:
  • SMTP connections - it is best when using SMTP to establish one connection to the mailer and then pipe multiple messages across this connection. This may not be an option if you are sending only a single message with your CGI.
  • reverse DNS - if your mail server is doing reverse-DNS lookups on each connection that could also slow down your aparent throughput when using Net::SMTP

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://138158]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (4)
As of 2016-10-01 18:08 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How many different varieties (color, size, etc) of socks do you have in your sock drawer?






    Results (3 votes). Check out past polls.