Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RFC refactoring

by Masem (Monsignor)
on Feb 15, 2002 at 15:18 UTC ( #145692=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: RFC refactoring
in thread RFC refactoring

And even then, with this test, while it's fair in how fast it accesses, the real concern would be the speed in breaking down the query string. I propose a better test would be :

use Benchmark; use CGI qw/:cgi /; use CGI::Simple; $ENV{'QUERY_STRING'} = 'foo=bar&baz=boo'; timethese(250000, {'CGI' => '$q = new CGI; $q->param("baz")', 'Simple' => '$s = new CGI::Simple; $s->param( +"baz")'});

Dr. Michael K. Neylon - || "You've left the lens cap of your mind on again, Pinky" - The Brain
"I can see my house from here!"
It's not what you know, but knowing how to find it if you don't know that's important

Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RFC refactoring
Download Code
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RFC refactoring
by tachyon (Chancellor) on Feb 16, 2002 at 00:27 UTC

    The qw/:cgi/ part is wrong as noted above but as you note there are a number of factors to CGI speed. Have a look at CGI::Simple vs - Is twice as fast good enough? for a much more thorough analysis.




Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://145692]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (11)
As of 2014-08-20 10:46 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    The best computer themed movie is:

    Results (110 votes), past polls