Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic

Re: A Beginner's Guide to Using Mail::Audit and Mail::SpamAssassin

by Anonymous Monk
on Mar 18, 2002 at 16:04 UTC ( #152498=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to A Beginner's Guide to Using Mail::Audit and Mail::SpamAssassin

I agree that Perl-based filtering is far nicer than procmail's horrid recipes, which is why I wrote my own Perl filter, parp. (Please note that I am currently making some small changes to the filtering API which will significantly simplify it.)

I am obviously horribly biased, but while Mail::Audit is a pretty decent quick hack, there are a number of things I dislike about its approach, and a number of advantages that parp has over it (daemon/queue mode, folder filtering mode, more powerful OO-based design, automatic regression testing, dynamic learning of trusted addresses, and lots more). I am also intending to provide support for Spam::Assassin in the near future (although I'm still not convinced that SpamAssassin's statistical approach is as flexible in principle as parp's builtin spam-detection heuristics).

  • Comment on Re: A Beginner's Guide to Using Mail::Audit and Mail::SpamAssassin

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://152498]
[LanX]: unusual that "Pimp my Bride" never made it into TV (?)
LanX sighs ... no idea stupid enough
[choroba]: "Smack My Bitch Up" did, though
[Eily]: that's the internet for you LanX
[Eily]: and I'm pretty sure there's a rule somewhere that states that the stupider the idea, the more likely it is to already have been done
zentara is thinking of moving to Mars to esacpe it all

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (14)
As of 2017-03-27 15:18 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?

    Results (320 votes). Check out past polls.