Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Smaller than an object?

by astaines (Curate)
on Aug 22, 2002 at 12:33 UTC ( #192002=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Smaller than an object?

My first thought was 'closure' and after thinking some more I feel that this is the right choice. At least in a Perl context these aren't recognisably objects, and I think that it makes life easier if your choice of names reflects the common syntax of the language.

Perhaps the key question is what will your successors expect these to be called? 'closure' while standard terminology, might not mean enough to them. Of couse you could document it somewhere in your meta-documentation/coding standards...


--
Anthony Staines

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://192002]
help
Chatterbox?
[LanX]: as long as he has votes left, the nodelet remains
[LanX]: There is a very simple solution ...
[marinersk]: Correct, so one workaround is to leave one vote.
[marinersk]: But I was looking for a more elegant solution. It appears noone online at this time is aware of one.
[LanX]: go to Nodelet Settings and click "All nodelets off"
[LanX]: SUPER STABLE!!!
[marinersk]: LanX++ LOL Yes, that is another workaround. :-)
[LanX]: strangely you can't disable the XP nodelet
[LanX]: But you can use CSS to hide it
[LanX]: and disoplay the data permanently in your peronal nodelet

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (5)
As of 2017-05-29 14:19 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?