Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

Re: Re: Future of Perl, Future of the Monastery

by theorbtwo (Prior)
on Aug 27, 2002 at 22:54 UTC ( #193299=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Future of Perl, Future of the Monastery
in thread Future of Perl, Future of the Monastery

Perl 6 is parrot's main reason for being, but IMHO it's /very/ important that it be a viable platform for running other things on, and that it actualy be used for that. It'll make it that much more likely that XS-like things that currently rely on reverse-engeneering and people's free time will, in the Parrot World, get supported by vendors. If parrot becomes the platform of choice for Python, Ruby, and Perl6, and vendors can support all three in One Fell Swoop, it's that much more likely that they will.

And, wonderful as CPAN is, think how much better it will be if you can take existing Python and Ruby code and integrate it into your Perl6 project without even thinking about it, with a simple use Whatever :py; (or whatever it ends up being).

Parrot being the defacto standard for other languages makes somthing that would be wonderful (and somwhat unlikely) that much more likely -- a parrot interpreter having hooks into a decent percentage of the installed base of browsers, and I very much look forward to being able to script browsers in parrot.

Perl6 may be the reason for building parrot, but if it becomes the only reason for running parrot, I'll be very disapointed.

(And I very much hope that ActiveState sees the light about taking an active posture in supporting parrot for it's other languages.)

Update: I was going to post this as a sepperate node, but I don't really have that much to say on it -- FoxtrotUniform++; couldn't have said it better myself. But I'd just like to note somthing -- "how do I tye my scheme and ruby code together" is a parrot issue, even though it has nothing to do with perl and a lot to do with scheme and ruby. It should probably be considered on-topic ground... but as with every other interface between ontopic and offtopic, it in no small part around here will depend on the actions of the voters, monks+ and editors who happen to be around when it comes up. One of the great things about the monastery is how self-regulating it is, normaly with a minimum of bickering.

Confession: It does an Immortal Body good.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://193299]
[moritz]: seems there's a size limit for hostenum, and the error message just sucks
[vrk]: None, other than the location of the error: auto/NetAddr/IP/
[vrk]: Aha, there's a reference to "bug report 82719" in NetAddr/'s sub _splitref.
[moritz]: wow, that's their idea of an "improved error message"
[moritz]: how about "This network is too large to enumerate all host addresses." or so?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (9)
As of 2017-04-25 07:39 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    I'm a fool:

    Results (449 votes). Check out past polls.