Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re: My coding guidelines

by mojotoad (Monsignor)
on Nov 25, 2002 at 18:12 UTC ( #215684=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to My coding guidelines

Excellent list. It's not often you see style guidelines along with some informative prose as to the why of the guidelines.

I was surprised by this part (24):

Note that there is whitespace between ++ and -- and their operands, and between -> and its operands.

What's the consensus on this one? I've always liked snug ++/-- and dereferencing:

++$wolverines; $rabbits--; $wombat->move(); $turtle = $menagerie->[4];

As opposed to:

++ $wolverines; $rabbits --; $wombat -> move(); $turtle = $menagerie -> [4];

For that matter, I've always made unary operators snug so that you can immediately find it's operand. This might be a holdout from C, but I do actually find the snug form more aesthetically pleasing.

On a somewhat visually related note, the arrow form of the left-associative operator works well with whitespace, however:

%myhash = ( lizard => 'gecko' );

Whereas the equivalent comma operator is snug with the left operand.

Thanks again for the list,
Matt


Comment on Re: My coding guidelines
Select or Download Code
Re: My coding guidelines
by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Nov 26, 2002 at 10:47 UTC
    Don't say always too fast. Are you sure you always snug unary operators? Including not?

    Abigail

      Since I never use 'not' in my code ... yes. ;)

      I take your point, however -- there are indeed exceptions. I think "english language" unary operators might be a whole class of exceptions since they parse (to us) as English rather than code.

      By the way, why is '->' a binary operator? From perldoc:

      "->" is an infix dereference operator, just as it is in C and C++. If the right side is either a ..., {...}, or a (...) subscript, then the left side must be either a hard or symbolic reference to an array, a hash, or a subroutine respectively. (Or technically speaking, a location capable of holding a hard reference, if it's an array or hash reference being used for assignment.) See perlreftut and perlref. Otherwise, the right side is a method name or a simple scalar variable containing either the method name or a subroutine reference, and the left side must be either an object (a blessed reference) or a class name (that is, a package name). See perlobj.

      Seems like dereferencing is dereferencing is dereferencing, no RHS required. Is there an association going on as well?

      Matt

        You wrote:
        Since I never use 'not' in my code ... yes. ;)

        If not, why not? What do you use instead?
        I find not is usually the cleanest and most readable operator for all sorts of tests.

        die "$usage" if not @ARGV; if (not -r $file) { die "Cannot read $file\n"; } print "$pattern not found in $file\n" if not $found;
        And so forth.

        --
        Regards,
        Helgi Briem
        helgi AT decode DOT is

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://215684]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (13)
As of 2014-07-11 13:13 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    When choosing user names for websites, I prefer to use:








    Results (224 votes), past polls