Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Parse::RecDescent eats large part of grammar, thinking it to be implicit subrule

by premchai21 (Curate)
on Jan 23, 2003 at 01:46 UTC ( #229195=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Parse::RecDescent eats large part of grammar, thinking it to be implicit subrule
in thread Parse::RecDescent eats large part of grammar, thinking it to be implicit subrule

The single-quote character is part of a double-quoted string, the curly braces do have Perl code inside them, and the parens define an implicit subrule, which should be interpretable but apparently isn't. Thanks for taking a look anyway.

As far as the intermediate steps, I created many subrules, then tested them individually first, which does approximately the same thing IINM.

  • Comment on Re: Re: Parse::RecDescent eats large part of grammar, thinking it to be implicit subrule

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://229195]
help
Chatterbox?
[marioroy]: why do some posters not know to provide a good SSCCE? Nested loops?
[Corion]: marioroy: Producing good SSCCE is an acquired skill :) You have to produce bad SSCCEs for a long time until you get good. And when you get good, you don't need them that much anymore because you simply isolate the problem and then solve it ;)
[marioroy]: ... and kcott is able to provide something. Amazing.
[hippo]: kcott's analysis consistently impresses.

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (8)
As of 2017-08-18 08:19 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Who is your favorite scientist and why?



























    Results (297 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?