Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Scientific Graphing, R and Perl

by scain (Curate)
on Mar 17, 2003 at 19:59 UTC ( #243777=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Scientific Graphing, R and Perl

People have complained about the quality of GD and its children's graphics quality, but you may want to test it out.

Scott
Project coordinator of the Generic Model Organism Database Project


Comment on Re: Scientific Graphing, R and Perl
Re: Re: Scientific Graphing, R and Perl
by Willard B. Trophy (Hermit) on Mar 17, 2003 at 20:37 UTC

    Maybe coyote is wanting hardcopy-quality output. Much as I like GD, sometimes you can beat good old EPS for quality graphics.

    There is a gnuplot module for Perl, but it looks like it only wants to talk bitmap output. You could always pipe your output into gnuplot, if it's up to the task in question.

    I have also seen absurdly complex graphs generated on the fly in pic, the troff-era interpreted graphics language, but that way madness lies.

    --
    bowling trophy thieves, die!

Re: Re: Scientific Graphing, R and Perl
by Coyote (Deacon) on Mar 17, 2003 at 21:02 UTC
    I've looked into GD. In addition to the generally spartan nature of the output, I don't think GD can do log scaled graphs or EPS output. These graphs need to be included in a LaTeX document which is being submitted to a journal for publication, so GD isn't going to do it for me. Thanks for you help, though.

    ----
    Coyote

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://243777]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-12-25 08:07 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (159 votes), past polls