Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: The plural of "athlete's foot" is...

by MrYoya (Monk)
on May 02, 2003 at 20:15 UTC ( #255151=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: The plural of "athlete's foot" is...
in thread The plural of "athlete's foot" is...

Yes, this is what I was thinking too.
Since its a mass noun (massive noun?), it would need a quantifier word such as "cases" or "problems" to refer to multiple instances. So you would say "There are three cases of athlete's foot".

However, you can also say "There are several itchy athlete's foots available". I think there's some kind of rule in English where you can just add an "s" or "es" to any noun to make it plural.


Comment on Re: Re: The plural of "athlete's foot" is...
Re: Re: Re: The plural of "athlete's foot" is...
by peacemaker1820 (Pilgrim) on May 09, 2003 at 16:21 UTC
    However, you can also say "There are several itchy athlete's foots available". I think there's some kind of rule in English where you can just add an "s" or "es" to any noun to make it plural.

    Maybe you meant "There are several itchy athlete's feet available."
    :-)

    No Peace Without War!
      You're right. What I meant was that, aside from the irregularly pluralized nouns, you can add "es" or "s". For example, the word "virus" has no plural in Latin, but we pluralize it to "viruses" -- a Latin word with an Anglo suffix.

      Since "athlete's foot" is a mass noun, it was questionable whether it even had a plural. But, on page 61 of A Concise Grammar of Contemporary English by Quirk and Greenbaum, it says "Virtually all non-count nouns can be treated as count nouns when used in classificatory senses:
      There are several French wines available (= kinds of wine)

      If it's a count noun, it has a plural. I mistakenly thought that since it was a compound noun, the plural would be formed like "${noun}s" or "${noun}es". But according to this page, it appears that "athlete's foot" undergoes regular plural inflection and thus the rightmost word would become plural. According to this logic, "athlete's foot" does have a plural and that plural is "athlete's feet".
      That, and googling "athelete's feet" returns about 80x the results of "athlete's foots" ;)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://255151]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (17)
As of 2014-09-18 16:49 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    How do you remember the number of days in each month?











    Results (120 votes), past polls