Re: •Re: More discipline or more freedom - in the context of OO

[danger]

in reply to •Re: More discipline or more freedom - in the context of OO
in thread More discipline or more freedom - in the context of OO

I don't think we can put Ruby in group 3 either --- while everything is indeed an object, the way Ruby is designed supports programming in a non--OO manner (even if there are objects behind the scenes).

[merlyn]

Well, that'd rule out Smalltalk and Eiffel then too, if that's your standard. Nothing at all would be in the third category. {grin}