Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked
 
PerlMonks  

CGI::Simple slower than CGI?

by epoptai (Curate)
on Dec 30, 2003 at 01:50 UTC ( #317602=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: HTML forms
in thread HTML forms

I took your advice and plugged CGI::Simple::Standard into a current project and found it consistently about 1/10 to 2/10 of a second slower than standard CGI. Current versions of both modules on activestate. Changing one line changed the output from times():

#use CGI qw(Vars param header redirect); use CGI::Simple::Standard qw(Vars param header redirect);

--
perl -MO=Deparse -e"u j t S n a t o e h r , e p l r a h k c r e"


Comment on CGI::Simple slower than CGI?
Download Code
Re: CGI::Simple slower than CGI?
by CountZero (Bishop) on Dec 30, 2003 at 09:48 UTC
    Very interesting: CGI::Simple states to be faster than CGI. So either this claim is not true or there is something else: perhaps CGI is preloaded by the server and CGI::Simple needs to be loaded again and again at the start of the script? If I have some time to spare during the next weekend, I might try some tests myself.

    Update: I now only see that you are using the functional interface to CGI::Simple (i.e. CGI::Simple::Standard) and that the claims to be faster only relate to the OO-interface.

    CountZero

    "If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://317602]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (9)
As of 2014-07-23 23:26 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (154 votes), past polls