Re: Learning from Obfuscation

Pretty much by definition, Obfu is free-form and lacks any set, rational design. Though there is certainly an underlieing thought processes, it likely varies widely from programmer to programmer, and each person may not be conciously aware of it.

As for obfu LISP, I'd be surprised if there wasn't such a beast. There may not be actual obfu contests like there are for Perl and C, but I'm sure somebody has tried making obfu LISP on purpose. Frell, I've made some lines of obfu Java back when I was programming that language a lot. If it can be done in Java, it can be done anywhere.

----
I wanted to explore how Perl's closures can be manipulated, and ended up creating an object system by accident.
-- Schemer

: () { :|:& };:

Note: All code is untested, unless otherwise stated

Comment on Re: Learning from Obfuscation Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Learning from Obfuscation by flyingmoose (Priest) on Jan 23, 2004 at 17:23 UTC
Any Java app over a couple hundred files is automatically obfuscated, that's just the way the language works (over encouraging inheritance hierachies when they don't make sense, way too many objects, non-data-driven constructs,"thick" connections and inflexible interfaces, lots of object-interdependancies, etc). The Java API is assuredly an obfuscation masterwork! It's Politically Correct Sphagetti (sp) coding and it's well loved by bad coders everywhere! Yes, in Java, bad coders can keep their jobs! Postulated: Any sufficiently large java program is indistinguishable from Chaucer's Canterbury Tales I may have to start the obfu-Lisp competition now. Lots of Insignificant Parenthesis = fun :)	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Learning from Obfuscation by hardburn (Abbot) on Jan 23, 2004 at 17:34 UTC
Any Java app over a couple hundred files is automatically obfuscated, But I could do it in just a few lines! Not that hard, really--just chain a bunch of method calls with short names. The hard part is finding a series of Java method calls with short names. ---- I wanted to explore how Perl's closures can be manipulated, and ended up creating an object system by accident. -- Schemer `: () { :\|:& };:` Note: All code is untested, unless otherwise stated	[reply] [d/l]
Re: Re: Learning from Obfuscation by Cirollo (Friar) on Jan 23, 2004 at 17:35 UTC
As for obfu LISP, I'd be surprised if there wasn't such a beast. There may not be actual obfu contests like there are for Perl and C, but I'm sure somebody has tried making obfu LISP on purpose. I did a couple of Google searches, and it seems that there's not really any obfuscated Lisp out there. Maybe it was so horrendous that the authors couldn't in good conscience unleash it on the world. Plus, it seems that Lisp obfuscations would generally consist of "Hey! Let's add more parentheses!" One of the great things about Perl obfuscation is that you can use so many cryptic non-alphanumeric characters. I think Lisp hackers tend to prefer writing things like quines and polyglots in their spare time.	[reply]
Re: Re: Learning from Obfuscation by flyingmoose (Priest) on Jan 23, 2004 at 17:58 UTC
I considered downvoting you for using Farscape swear words, but thought better of it :) (just kidding folks, move along!)	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Learning from Obfuscation by hardburn (Abbot) on Jan 23, 2004 at 18:21 UTC
Bah, what kind of dren is that? :)	[reply]
Re^2: Learning from Obfuscation by Nkuvu (Priest) on Jan 23, 2004 at 18:12 UTC
If it can be done in Java, it can be done anywhere. Even Python? :)	[reply]


laziness, impatience, and hubris
	PerlMonks