comment on

It sounds like you are looking more for a code review, not a tester. If that is the case, you may get more responses with a different title.

If that is the case, post the code here, within <readmore><code>...</code></readmore> tags. PerlMonks seems to prefer having posts fairly well self contained, in order to allow for the content to be long lived.

That being said, I would probably start your options gathering with Getopt::Long or something similar. Prompting the user is not necessarily a bad thing, but not allowing for automation is (imo). That is all the further I got at this point.

--MidLifeXis

In reply to Re: RFC: Script testers needed (ITYM code review) by MidLifeXis
in thread RFC: Code testers/reviewers needed by AI Cowboy

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


XP is just a number
	PerlMonks