|
|
|
| "be consistent" | |
| PerlMonks |
Re^2: Considering nodes for re-titlingby Joost (Canon) |
| on Jan 06, 2005 at 18:40 UTC ( [id://420020]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
I agree. Removing the old title doesn't really serve a purpose unless it's abusive. Using "New title (was: old title)" or "New title (renamed from: old title)" seems like a good idea to me. And the Janitors can mangle abusive titles if they need to - "Why use perl (Was: perl *****)".
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||