Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re: I present to you... Horrible code!

by cchampion (Curate)
on Jan 08, 2005 at 09:29 UTC ( [id://420490]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to I present to you... Horrible code!

Not golfing, because you won't get decent code from golfing horrible code.

I'd rather see this code as a spot-the-mistakes execise.

Thus, here come my changes:

my @quarters = qw/none first second third fourth/; sub termgrades { my ($period, $quarter) = @_; $sth = $dbh->prepare_cached( qq{SELECT * FROM $quarters[$quarter]quarter WHERE userid = ? AND period = ? AND gradetype = ?} ) or &error( "2", "$userdata[0] $quarters[$quarter] quarter " . "grades database search failed: $DBI::errstr" ); $sth->execute( $userdata[0], $period, 2 ) or &error( "2", "$userdata[0] quarter grades " ." database search failed: $DBI::errstr" ); }

update
Changed the @quarters array to avoid a minor bug. Thanks to itub.

However, the first blunder, the one that eventually led to the current horrible code, is that there are four database tables instead of one.

Thus the first order of business would be to merge those four tables into one, adding a "quarter" column.

With that in mind, you could rewrite the above function as follows:

sub termgrades { my ($period, $quarter) = @_; $sth = $dbh->prepare_cached( qq{SELECT * FROM quarters WHERE userid = ? AND period = ? AND gradetype = ? and quarter = ?} ) or &error( "2", "$userdata[0] quarter $quarter grades " . "database search failed: $DBI::errstr" ); $sth->execute( $userdata[0], $period, 2, $quarter ) or &error( "2", "$userdata[0] quarter grades " ." database search failed: $DBI::errstr" ); return $sth; # perhaps ... see text }

That said, this function, in its original form, is completely useless, because it is executing a SELECT request from a locally scoped statement handler, and its result would be simply lost. A returning statement for such a handler is needed, if you want to pursue any practical purpose.

What else? Ah, yes, the global @userdata array, of which we have just to assume it exists and has valid data in it. It should be passed as an argument as well.

FInally, that naked numeric literal "2" used as an argument to "execute" and "error" should be turned into a variable, so that whoever has to maintain the code knows what it is about.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: I present to you... Horrible code!
by itub (Priest) on Jan 08, 2005 at 15:18 UTC
    There is one minor error: your @quarters array is zero-based, but the quarter as passed to the method counts from 1 ($quarters[1] is "second").

    Should the "2" passed to "error" be a named constant instead of a magic number? Who knows, perhaps if this is an error level number a number is not that bad. If you turn the error levels into names, make sure that they are clear, unlike the US Homeland Security Advisory System (I always have trouble remembering whether "high" is higher than "elevated" or the other way around ;-) )

Re^2: I present to you... Horrible code!
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Jan 08, 2005 at 17:33 UTC
    That said, this function, in its original form, is completely useless, because it is executing a SELECT request from a locally scoped statement handler, and its result would be simply lost.

    Oh, there's more fun than that, my friend! There are some databases where you can set up a view in such a way that a SELECT against it actually makes changes to stuff. In Oracle 9, you can actually have it do literally anything, including executing Perl code.

    Being right, does not endow the right to be rude; politeness costs nothing.
    Being unknowing, is not the same as being stupid.
    Expressing a contrary opinion, whether to the individual or the group, is more often a sign of deeper thought than of cantankerous belligerence.
    Do not mistake your goals as the only goals; your opinion as the only opinion; your confidence as correctness. Saying you know better is not the same as explaining you know better.

      That's some messy programming-by-side-effect there. Sure, calling an external database is already a side-effect, but it's the sort you pretty much have to live with. If the posted code is using such a view, I wouldn't consider it an improvement.

      "There is no shame in being self-taught, only in not trying to learn in the first place." -- Atrus, Myst: The Book of D'ni.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://420490]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-03-19 10:57 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found