Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Just Another Discussion of Spam

by BazB (Priest)
on Mar 17, 2005 at 21:18 UTC ( #440546=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Just Another Discussion of Spam

There are a number of problems with your idea: the first one being that spammers regularly forge From: addresses.

SMTP does support VRFY (verify) and EXPN (expand) commands to check that a given account exists on a machine, however this has long since been disabled by most administrators (myself included) ever since spammers started abusing the system to identify and harvest valid accounts. Have a read of RFC2821 - SMTP

An alternative would be to try and send a test message to the accounts, but you'd be effectively spamming too.

Even if you could verify the existence of an address, would you really want to delete all messages from an email address that no longer exists?
I've got emails going back quite a few years, many of which were sent from email addresses I know are defunct after friends have changed ISP or webmail providers and so on.

Spam Assassin does a pretty good job of filtering spam - I'd recommend using that (or an alternative tool), rather than your fairly coarse criteria.

Cheers,

BazB


If the information in this post is inaccurate, or just plain wrong, don't just downvote - please post explaining what's wrong.
That way everyone learns.


Comment on Re: Just Another Discussion of Spam
Reaped: Spam Me "TEST"
by NodeReaper (Curate) on Oct 03, 2007 at 08:03 UTC
      I prefer spiced salmon.

      -David

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://440546]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (5)
As of 2014-07-13 19:11 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    When choosing user names for websites, I prefer to use:








    Results (251 votes), past polls