Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Alternation in Effective Perl Programming Example

by chromatic (Archbishop)
on Dec 07, 2000 at 09:03 UTC ( #45445=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Alternation in Effective Perl Programming Example

It's a little more than that. Should it be (?:\\\W|.) instead?

If so, as written, it would be interpreted as non-capturing parenthesis, matching either a backslash and a nonword character or a single character.

Otherwise, it's (an optional colon followed by a backslash and a non-word character) or (a single character).


Comment on Re: Alternation in Effective Perl Programming Example
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Alternation in Effective Perl Programming Example
by a (Friar) on Dec 07, 2000 at 09:43 UTC
    Appears to be (looking at Effective perl) a typo, as the chapter leans heavily on (?: just before the example. You should mention it to merlyn as its not in the errata (neither is the misspelled 'Eart' on page 64 ;-)

    a

      And, to the original question: I think the idea is to 'inch along'
      for (split m!("(?:\\\W|.)*?"|/\*|\*/)!) {
      will return the pieces ending w/ an escaped non-word char, a single char or the comment begin/end markers. Hmm, an escaped non-word char or a single char in quotes? No, as many \\\w|. as found between quotes. I guess so:
      biff = "not a comment /*"; /* marker for not a comment */
      won't start $in_comment too early.

      a

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://45445]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (7)
As of 2015-07-31 03:31 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (274 votes), past polls