Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re: "Baby" Perl versus "Bad" Perl

by itub (Priest)
on Dec 03, 2005 at 23:19 UTC ( #513870=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to "Baby" Perl versus "Bad" Perl

"for" is for C-style loops and "foreach" is for iterating over arrays.

I'm confused--what's wrong with that? That's the convention used in the perldocs, isn't it? (I personally always type "for" out of laziness, but I don't complain if someone prefers to type "foreach" to iterate over an array).


Comment on Re: "Baby" Perl versus "Bad" Perl
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: "Baby" Perl versus "Bad" Perl
by Ovid (Cardinal) on Dec 03, 2005 at 23:33 UTC

    There's nothing wrong with using that as a convention. However, there is no behavioral difference between "for" and "foreach". Teaching that they aren't the same thing is wrong.

    Cheers,
    Ovid

    New address of my CGI Course.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://513870]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (11)
As of 2015-07-08 06:31 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (94 votes), past polls