Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re^7: Tk and Threads (again)

by Courage (Parson)
on Jan 23, 2006 at 18:32 UTC ( #525006=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^6: Tk and Threads (again)
in thread Tk and Threads (again)

I haven't read your post, now I did.
++, interesting read, I mostly agree with many points of that
Still, I am not agree to waste plenty of resources just to accomplish some simple tasks. I do not want to get rid of car and use trucks just because I decided to pack my small boxes into huge containers.

Closer to your current point, there were no "6 major releases of Perl".
You probably meant some maintenance releases between 5.8.0 and 5.8.7?
Those are even not a minor releases, those are even less than that, those are maintenance, or patch releases (in my, probably broken, classification).

Did I tried threading recently? - yes, I did, in 5.8.6
As you already guessed, I failed, namely within Tk+Threads on Win32.
My attempt will probably fit into your classification of incorrect attempts, but, in my opinion, those were sane enough.

On the other side, I agree with an opinion that threads will mature faster if larger user base will be; and any support will stuck if all refuse trying.

add: sorry for my unperfect English. Some people say it is unperfect but perfectly adequate, I don't know :)
All I do know - I am unperfect :):):)

Best regards,
Courage, the Cowardly Dog


Comment on Re^7: Tk and Threads (again)
Re^8: Tk and Threads (again)
by Ace128 (Hermit) on Jan 23, 2006 at 22:57 UTC
    Somehow, I love threads! :)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://525006]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (13)
As of 2014-07-30 19:19 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (240 votes), past polls