Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: A Perl Success Story

by derby (Abbot)
on Apr 28, 2006 at 12:53 UTC ( #546258=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: A Perl Success Story
in thread A Perl Success Story

There's nothing wrong with off-the-cuff guesses and if I had to put a dollar figure on your savings, it would be something like this:

  • a month is 4 weeks
  • a week is 40 hours
  • assume one engineer
  • assume $100 labor rate
  • cost for six months - 96,000 (6*4*40*1*100)
  • cost for one week - 4,000 (40*1*100)
  • savings - 92,000 (96,000 - 4,000)

To me, these are the types of numbers you take to management not only to show the ROI on perl (and maybe convince them to send a bit of that savings to the Perl Foundation) but more importantly to show the ROI on you (and maybe convince them to spend a bit of that savings on you).

-derby

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://546258]
help
Chatterbox?
[LanX]: interesting the author doesn't seem to accept javascript as a scripting language
[LanX]: ... and calls php7 the winner oO
[RonW]: RPerl is only a curiosity to me. I can see where some one who primarily codes in Perl might find RPerl useful, but to me, given the choice between RPerl's restrictions and C, I'd choose C
[LanX]: Rperl had better chances as alternative for inline::cpp

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2017-05-22 20:40 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?