Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change

Re^2: The Ackermann Function

by gjb (Vicar)
on Jun 20, 2006 at 19:26 UTC ( #556515=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: The Ackermann Function
in thread The Ackermann Function

I'm afraid this doesn't make sense to me. Are you suggesting that the Ackermann function should simply not be computed if the conditions for branch 3 hold? That would imply that one can only compute A(0, i) and A(i, 0), which is not particularly interesting.

I may miss your point, but I'd be a bit surprised if FSMs would be useful in this context. Can you show us what you have in mind?

Just my 2 cents, -gjb-

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: The Ackermann Function
by NetWallah (Abbot) on Jun 21, 2006 at 01:28 UTC
    Oh - I beg to differ - His Noodly Appendage, the FSM is relevent in EVERY context !

         "For every complex problem, there is a simple answer ... and it is wrong." --H.L. Mencken

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://556515]
LanX thanks Ophelia for the great weather - summer reloaded! :)

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (8)
As of 2017-10-17 12:11 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    My fridge is mostly full of:

    Results (229 votes). Check out past polls.