Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Ternary operator (there's no Trinary operator )

by spiritway (Vicar)
on Jul 19, 2006 at 18:42 UTC ( #562386=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Ternary operator (there's no Trinary operator )

You've got a good point. I don't know what would be involved, nor how practical it would be, but putting something like Google's "do you mean foo?" in Super Search might be helpful. If that's impractical, then maybe a sort of Wiki-like "disambiguation page" for the more common mistakes. Ternary/Trinary would be a good one. Can't think of anything else right off, but surely there are plenty more.

OTOH, I suppose that if I did enter something about trinary operators, I'd encounter questions using that term, and see the corrections offered by the Monks - so I'm not sure that it would be worthwhile to go to the trouble of making such changes. I wonder whether this is a big enough problem to "fix" anything.

  • Comment on Re: Ternary operator (there's no Trinary operator )

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://562386]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (8)
As of 2016-12-09 00:48 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    On a regular basis, I'm most likely to spy upon:













    Results (148 votes). Check out past polls.