|Perl Monk, Perl Meditation|
Re^2: Regex Or Die!by TheDamian (Priest)
|on Sep 27, 2006 at 22:25 UTC||Need Help??|
There's nothing wrong with unlessSure there is. And I spent a page and a half in PBP explaining precisely what was wrong with it. In summary:
The result is that (as PBP points out):
unless and until are inherently harder to maintain. In particular, whenever a negative control statement is extended to include a negative operator, it will have to be re-cast as a positive control, which requires you to change both the keyword and the conditional....Not only is that extra effort, it's error-prone effort. Reworking conditionals in that way is an excellent opportunity to introduce new and subtle bugs into your program....This kind of mistake is unfortunately common, but fortunately very easy to avoid. If you never use an unless or until, then you'll never have to rewrite it as an if or while. Moreover, if your control statements are always "positive", your code will generally be more comprehensible to all readers, regardless of the complexity of its logical expressions...
I don't proscribe unless because it's never appropriate. I recommend against it because it's often eventually inappropriate. Because, in all but the simplest cases, it ultimately makes comprehension and maintenenance harder and provides an opportunity for bugs to creep in as code is extended.
Now, you may not agree with that arguments or my conclusion, and that's fine. But it's not accurate to assert that I'm merely letting:
personal opinions slip in there
or to imply that I did not have carefully thought-out reasons for my advice.
Indeed, it's easy to demonstrate that the deprecation of unless was not just personal opinion. If you examine the source code of my modules that predate PBP, you will find many instances of unless. So, until I sat down to examine and codify Perl best practice my personal opinion was apparently that unless was fine. It was only after I reviewed the arguments for and against, discussed the issue (vigorously and at length ;-) with my many reviewers, examined the mistakes that I and many of my clients had made using unless, and thought about the long-term implications of deploying the construct, that I concluded it should not be used.
Of course, that still is a personal opinion—just like everything else that everyone else ever says—but it a personal opinion based on reasoned argument and extensive professional and pedagogical experience.
On the other hand, your subsequent point that blind acceptance of my advice is contrary to the spirit of the book is perfectly valid. I spent the first chapter asking people to think about these issues, to evaluate my arguments, and then to decide for themselves. However, not everyone has the time, the will, or the capacity to do that, which is why I tried to make the advice as careful and conservative as possible, so that those who do adopt it wholesale will be unharmed by the suggestions I made.
By the way, to answer the original poster's original question, my suggestion would be: