|
Re:
by tye (Cardinal) on Feb 13, 2001 at 04:21 UTC |
FYI, this was Adam's 666th node. Did I mention he
was evil? ;)
-
tye
(but my friends call me when they need help doing evil)
| [reply] |
|
| [reply] |
|
I'm hurt. :-)
The node was intentionally blank, to "be evil", and the Reaper understood that, and left it behind. It was, after all, my 666th post. It was a joke. I'm sorry if you didn't find it funny.
| [reply] |
|
Don't you dare reap this node.
It's great.
It's the greatest meditation i've come accross since i joined the monastery.
It speaks volumes.
"It still means nothing to the vast majority(if any?) of Perlmonks users though."
What are you talking about.
Where does it say that a post has to appeal to everyone, even a majority.
It's not troll-like, and is here for everyone who was just so fed up with anything, and it says: " " - that's all you can say.
Silence is beautiful.
Silence is mesmerizing.
Silence is peace.
Silence is wisdom.
Silence is forever open to interpretation.
All praise Adam and his evil ways.
___crazyinsomniac_______________________________________
Disclaimer: Don't blame. It came from inside the void
perl -e "$q=$_;map({chr unpack qq;H*;,$_}split(q;;,q*H*));print;$q/$q;"
| [reply] |
|
Re:
by tye (Cardinal) on Mar 23, 2001 at 20:46 UTC |
| [reply] |
|
I am glad that someone did something interesting with this node! :-)
| [reply] |
|
Sadly, if you access this re: node, you can't click "in reply to" or "in thread" to get back to this.
p
| [reply] |
|
Hahahahahahaha.... Nice catch there Tye!
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
-- March 22, 1977, Donald E. Knuth
| [reply] |
Re: ap: th: is: no: de: no
by naikonta (Curate) on Apr 16, 2007 at 05:23 UTC |
| [reply] |
