Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks Frank
Do you know where your variables are?
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Which version of Soap::Lite for writing document/literal web services?

by john_oshea (Priest)
on Feb 18, 2007 at 10:47 UTC ( #600674=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Which version of Soap::Lite for writing document/literal web services?

From the reading I've done, it seems like there is a degree of risk regardless of which SOAP stack you use, unless you can guarantee that your clients and servers are using the same one. If you have something that works sufficiently well for your target audience already, I'd be tempted to leave it as is.

The SOAP:: Lite Changes file has a fairly comprehensive list of the changes between 0.60 and 0.69 if you want to see what you may be missing out on - in particular, there seem to have been a substantial amount of changes around the 0.65 revision(s).

Hope that helps.


Comment on Re: Which version of Soap::Lite for writing document/literal web services?
Re^2: Which version of Soap::Lite for writing document/literal web services?
by Anonymous Monk on Oct 15, 2007 at 07:33 UTC
    Hi, I am using soaplite version 0.69 without custom serializers and it works. I just create messages with SOAP::Data package. There are not many examples with soaplite and document/literal style as server. It would be grate if someone gives any examples. Regards, Ive

      Untested by me (but definitely filed for further investigation): this would seem to be exactly what you're after. I'd appreciate hearing any feedback you have from this approach if you give it a go.

      Hope that helps

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://600674]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-04-20 19:17 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (486 votes), past polls