Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks RobOMonk
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: [Good news] here docs portability!

by gaal (Parson)
on Jun 17, 2007 at 06:08 UTC ( #621665=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: [Good news] here docs portability!
in thread [Good news] here docs portability!

Better make that /bin/echo...

What was I thinking, qx// is executed with /bin/sh regardless of user's favorite shell.


Comment on Re^3: [Good news] here docs portability!
Select or Download Code
Re^4: [Good news] here docs portability!
by ysth (Canon) on Jun 17, 2007 at 07:33 UTC
    No, you are correct; the shell's `` will prefer the builtin echo, so what I gave won't work under some shells without explicitly asking for the coreutils /bin/echo. (Wow, the POSIX standard for echo is really dumb.)
      As much as I like being right by accident, don't even old Bourne shells honor -e? In my original comment, I was thinking of c shells, which do not.

      But instead of relying on the system's /bin/echo, which who knows, might be broken in rusty old systems, why not use Perl for this command (since we know the user has it...)

        Broken? Per POSIX, -e is not a special flag, and should be output. With the XSI extensions, you are supposed to get \r -> CR whether you want it or not. Without XSI, the output when there are backslashes is undefined.

        So perl is the way to go.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://621665]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-04-17 02:34 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (437 votes), past polls