Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: [Good news] here docs portability!

by gaal (Parson)
on Jun 17, 2007 at 07:39 UTC ( #621668=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: [Good news] here docs portability!
in thread [Good news] here docs portability!

As much as I like being right by accident, don't even old Bourne shells honor -e? In my original comment, I was thinking of c shells, which do not.

But instead of relying on the system's /bin/echo, which who knows, might be broken in rusty old systems, why not use Perl for this command (since we know the user has it...)

  • Comment on Re^5: [Good news] here docs portability!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: [Good news] here docs portability!
by ysth (Canon) on Jun 17, 2007 at 07:44 UTC
    Broken? Per POSIX, -e is not a special flag, and should be output. With the XSI extensions, you are supposed to get \r -> CR whether you want it or not. Without XSI, the output when there are backslashes is undefined.

    So perl is the way to go.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://621668]
help
Chatterbox?
[stevieb]: Corion: the problem with that is the 2.36 represents the underlying C library I've wrapped, which is why I want to use incrementals after the real version number. I've emailed modules@ to see if they can expedite the process for me...
[stevieb]: ...as normally, it takes three days to delete, in case you want to change your mind

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (11)
As of 2017-01-19 15:09 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you watch meteor showers?




    Results (170 votes). Check out past polls.