Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Refactoring Perl 3 - Inline Temp

by rvosa (Curate)
on Jul 21, 2007 at 16:23 UTC ( #628004=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Refactoring Perl #3 - Inline Temp

So, what if the method is expensive? Why would you want to do the same thing twice?


Comment on Re: Refactoring Perl 3 - Inline Temp
Re^2: Refactoring Perl 3 - Inline Temp
by agianni (Hermit) on Jul 23, 2007 at 12:45 UTC

    You certainly don't have to refactor. This is just a pattern you can use to make your code cleaner. I generally find that writing good code is always a balance between clean code and efficient code. It's great when you can do both, but often you have to pick one.

    If you really need this refactoring and the method is expensive, you can always look into caching mechanisms. I can't recommend anything particularly complicated, as I haven't done any caching of methods that take arguments (the complicated part) but I'm sure there are some CPAN modules that would help.

    perl -e 'split//,q{john hurl, pest caretaker}and(map{print @_[$_]}(joi +n(q{},map{sprintf(qq{%010u},$_)}(2**2*307*4993,5*101*641*5261,7*59*79 +*36997,13*17*71*45131,3**2*67*89*167*181))=~/\d{2}/g));'

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://628004]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (14)
As of 2014-11-25 20:57 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My preferred Perl binaries come from:














    Results (158 votes), past polls