Re^2: Were it not a monastery, my favourite metaphor for PerlMonks would have been:

Comment on Re^2: Were it not a monastery, my favourite metaphor for PerlMonks would have been:

Re^3: Were it not a monastery, my favourite metaphor for PerlMonks would have been:
by blazar (Canon) on Aug 16, 2007 at 17:15 UTC

The first rule of Perl club… has subscript 0. Unless you changed $[. But don't!

[reply]
[d/l]

Re^3: Were it not a monastery, my favourite metaphor for PerlMonks would have been:
by Cop on Oct 13, 2007 at 19:56 UTC

Don't OO, unless you know nothing about OO.

[reply]

Re^4: Were it not a monastery, my favourite metaphor for PerlMonks would have been:

by grep (Monsignor) on Oct 14, 2007 at 01:31 UTC

Don't OO, unless you know nothing about OO.

You may want to check the logic of your statement there.
but then again why start now?

grep

One dead unjugged rabbit fish later...

[reply]

Re^5: Were it not a monastery, my favourite metaphor for PerlMonks would have been:

by Cop on Oct 14, 2007 at 01:58 UTC

I have been waiting for this dramatic moment the whole day;-)

You got sharp eyes, but my logic was just fine.

The meaning of my statement is: Perl's OO is so poor, and you will choose it only if you don't know what OO is. If you know anything about OO, you won't use Perl OO at all.

[reply]

Re^6: Were it not a monastery, my favourite metaphor for PerlMonks would have been:

by Anonymous Monk on Oct 14, 2007 at 02:47 UTC


Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
	PerlMonks

Re^2: Were it not a monastery, my favourite metaphor for PerlMonks would have been:

How many continents have you visited?