Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: RubyForge vs CPAN: Is Perl's Killer Feature Being Usurped?

by adrianh (Chancellor)
on Sep 20, 2007 at 12:26 UTC ( #640105=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: RubyForge vs CPAN: Is Perl's Killer Feature Being Usurped?
in thread RubyForge vs CPAN: Is Perl's Killer Feature Being Usurped?

Does RubyForge require users to be registered to download code?

Nope - but there are forums and some other stuff that are better when registered. Really RF is closer to SourceForge than it is to CPAN in many ways, with Gems doing a chunk of the long-list-o-stuff the various interpretations of CPAN do.

  • Comment on Re^2: RubyForge vs CPAN: Is Perl's Killer Feature Being Usurped?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://640105]
help
Chatterbox?
[Discipulus]: Eily i'm testing a failure: i ok if i get bad results.. perhaps there is another way to do it...
[Discipulus]: in other words: i have a contructor that carps on missing arguments and I want to test that it fails correctly, without carping out in the test output

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2018-01-22 11:31 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How did you see in the new year?










    Results (233 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?