The stupid question is the question not asked | |
PerlMonks |
Re^3: Perl Certification revisitedby Herkum (Parson) |
on Oct 19, 2007 at 15:58 UTC ( [id://646011]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I will only hire Perl developers who either have stuff on CPAN or are vouched for by someone who does I disagree with this because CPAN is about common useful utilities to the community, not to pad someone's job credentials. I also don't like the exclusivity of saying "I created a module on CPAN therefore I must be an expert". How many Perl programmers are there in the world? 50,000? They should be vetted by the 1,000 authors on CPAN? It is unrealistic and being a CPAN author does not necessarily indicate their ability to determine another persons skill set. I would love for Perl to be treated (by PHB's) as a true PROFESSIONAL language that is on the same level with .NET or Java rather than just a scripting language like BASH. If that means that is a Perl certification would bring this level of recognition then I am all for it. While I agree that a certification is not necessarily a good way of determining a persons skills. It does provide something to make a decision on besides a gut feeling This is especially so for a non-technical manager..
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|