Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: History now influences voting (one author)

by tye (Cardinal)
on Nov 19, 2007 at 07:03 UTC ( #651610=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: History now influences voting
in thread History now influences voting

I'll likely just abandon that feature idea. I already don't see an efficient way to avoid enough false positives. Thanks, that did help.

- tye        


Comment on Re^2: History now influences voting (one author)
Re^3: History now influences voting (one author)
by sfink (Deacon) on Nov 20, 2007 at 20:37 UTC
    This is a somewhat pointless reply, since you've already abandoned it, but I'll mention it anyway to have it taken into consideration for future changes.

    I don't really like the idea of disincentivizing casting multiple upvotes (or even all of your upvotes) for a single author, because I think there is a fairly common positive scenario where this happens. When I read posts where I can tell that the author really knows what they are talking about, or s/he has a vein of expertise in something I find useful, I will start reading through that author's old posts. It's a handy way of discovering a vein of brilliance in the mountain of nodes out there, and it can often uncover some gems that aren't identified well by the node reputation mechanism.

    You could construct an advanced Perl course for yourself simply by reading and understanding all of ikegami's posts, for example. Or I remember when tilly had to bow out of the Monastery, I went through quite a few of his nodes.

    When undertaking such an author-centric mining expedition, it's natural to upvote the nodes you really like along the way. In fact, it will probably bring those nodes' reputations more in line with their "true value".

    That said, I think that use case is still less common than the more typical "I want to reward this author so I'll randomly pick from his/her nodes and upvote them", which doesn't make the nodes' reputations any more accurate.

    Note that planetscape was defending (well, preserving) the practice of topic-centric browsing, partly by saying that it correlates with the presumably undesirable author-centric voting; I am saying that there are not uncommon cases where author-centric browsing is desirable as well.

Re^3: History now influences voting (one author)
by graq (Curate) on Apr 02, 2008 at 14:07 UTC
    Perhaps the amount of xp that the votes have caused can be an indicator? Thus taking into consideration all the other weightings?

    -=( Graq )=-

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://651610]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (3)
As of 2014-09-17 05:43 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    How do you remember the number of days in each month?











    Results (58 votes), past polls