Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl Monk, Perl Meditation
 
PerlMonks  

Re: threads::shared variables not really shared... or are they?

by renodino (Curate)
on Mar 06, 2008 at 23:51 UTC ( #672632=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to threads::shared variables not really shared... or are they?

Shared scalars, arrays, and hashes are indeed shared, but via tied proxy mechanism. The actual data resides in a shared Perl interpretter context; the usual tie() operations then route all reads/writes (and various metadata operations) to execute against the shared interpretter's version of the variables. Note that, for scalars, the shared value does get copied into the private proxy on read().

I can't say precisely why your example doesn't grow significantly, except that the array tie() operations won't populate the private proxy copy in each thread, instead routing directly to the shared interpretter's version of the array. So in your example, the private @a never grows, only the shared version.

Note that if you were vivifying individual shared scalars, you likely would see some significant memory growth, since there would be a copy in both the originating thread, and in the shared interpretter.

Also note that the shared interpretter is one of the major bottlenecks in ithreads: as you might imagine, a Perl interpretter context holds a lot of state, thus concurrent access requires a major lock on the whole thing...which unfortunately can create a lot of thread contention.


Perl Contrarian & SQL fanboy


Comment on Re: threads::shared variables not really shared... or are they?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://672632]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (9)
As of 2014-07-28 08:41 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (193 votes), past polls