Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: Splitting on escapable delimiter

by Roy Johnson (Monsignor)
on Mar 31, 2008 at 19:55 UTC ( #677628=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Splitting on escapable delimiter
in thread Splitting on escapable delimiter

That's weird. I'm trying to figure out why mine takes another pass after encountering end of string (even if I specify that the separator can be end-of-string). Meanwhile, I'll point out that your method finds only one field in '@' (instead of two empty ones — if there's no newline after the @).

Update: this seems to work:

my @pieces = /(?:^|\G@)((?:#.|[^@])*)/sg;
Still don't know why I couldn't get it to realize it had hit end of string. My guess is, if end-of-string is not required to match, it takes another shot to make sure nothing matches.

Caution: Contents may have been coded under pressure.


Comment on Re^4: Splitting on escapable delimiter
Download Code
Re^5: Splitting on escapable delimiter
by ikegami (Pope) on Mar 31, 2008 at 21:49 UTC

    Still don't know why I couldn't get it to realize it had hit end of string

    It's seen as somewhat of a bug. It happens when the search expression can match a zero length string. In the followig, the parens indicate what the three passes of your earlier s/// matches:

    (a@)(b)()

    Or in terms of @- and @+:
    pass@-@+
    102
    223
    333

    The /g loop ends when the fourth pass matches the same thing as the third pass and pos+1 is beyond the end of the string.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://677628]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (5)
As of 2014-07-22 07:29 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (106 votes), past polls