Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: How should I do (and document) effective semi-formal code review?

by radiantmatrix (Parson)
on Jun 19, 2008 at 15:39 UTC ( #692947=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: How should I do (and document) effective semi-formal code review?
in thread How should I do (and document) effective semi-formal code review?

(you have specs, right?)

But of course. ;-)

Thank you much for the input. I'd not thought of the review as a meeting.

<radiant.matrix>
Ramblings and references
“A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.” Herm Albright
I haven't found a problem yet that can't be solved by a well-placed trebuchet
  • Comment on Re^2: How should I do (and document) effective semi-formal code review?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://692947]
help
Chatterbox?
[stevieb]: interestingly enough, someone else got my Devel::Examine:: Subs distribution for their PRC, and I applaud the change. This dist is extremely complicated and mostly obfu, but the person doing it understood PPI enough to change...
[stevieb]: ...something I had overlooked in the extreme depths of the core functionality. After merging, then a couple of extra tweaks, I still have 100% test coverage. Yay for people who write tests!

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (5)
As of 2017-01-24 01:20 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you watch meteor showers?




    Results (199 votes). Check out past polls.