Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked

(tye)Re: Alternatives to Taint Checking?

by tye (Sage)
on May 24, 2001 at 03:29 UTC ( #82771=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Alternatives to Taint Checking?

But in the context of taint checking w/ CGI, isn't the main point just that you should scrub your CGI parameters?? Your web server should not be set-UID to root so the security problem is that stuff from "the world" needs to be checked.

So isn't a reasonable solution as simple as replacing the few methods that get data from the client with versions that require "scrubbing instructions"? I'd probably make a tiny hack to to prevent it from being used directly and then make a CGI::Safe where the param() method is a fatal error but safeparam() requires an extra argument that is the scrubbing instructions.

I'd support a few formats of scrubbing instructions. You should make the most common case of requiring the parameter value to match /^\w[-\w.]*\z/ be very easy. But if a ref to a regex is provided, then apply the regex and die if it fails, return $1 if successful. If a code ref is provided, just run that code.

        - tye (but my friends call me "Tye")

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://82771]
Discipulus open a red wine bottle and ..
Discipulus adds tozzetti alle mandorle to the platter on the sideboard.
[Discipulus]: the most monastic cookie!

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (7)
As of 2017-04-27 10:32 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    I'm a fool:

    Results (503 votes). Check out past polls.