Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks Joe
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: My Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator is ...

by gloryhack (Deacon)
on Apr 05, 2010 at 19:28 UTC ( #832890=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to My Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator is ...

Labels are great for products on shelves and the controls of machinery, but are bad when applied to human beings.


Comment on Re: My Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator is ...
Re^2: My Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator is ...
by fullermd (Curate) on Apr 06, 2010 at 03:17 UTC

    That's banal. Labels are excellent when applied to human beings. It's impossible to get through life without applying labels to people, and ridiculously tedious to try.

    I've labelled everyone I've ever met or known. I have a Mother and a Father and a Brother. I've had Bosses and Coworkers, Friends and Lovers, Mentors and Mentees, Accomplices and Foils. It's a rare person who merits only one descriptor, and for that matter many occupy more than one at a time. Most, probably.

    What you mean by that hackneyed and rather unctuous statement is that labels are descriptions, not definitions. Any programmer knows you'll get yourself in deep trouble if you confuse reference and referent :)

      You've apparently overlooked the context in which my statement was made. HAND.
Re^2: My Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator is ...
by nimdokk (Vicar) on Apr 08, 2010 at 16:36 UTC
    I would say that labelling or categorizing things (people, places, animals, &c.) is a part of human nature. As fullermd wrote, it's the difference between "description" and "definition." At various times in our lives, we ourselves have different lables that can be applied to us some of which change over time, some stay with us for our entire lives. Some describe our relationships with others while others may describe what we do (and it could even be argued that what we do is still a relationship to other humans). For example when I was a young, I had the labels: Child/Son, Grandchild/son, Nephew, Cousin. As I grew older, I could add: "boyfriend" to the list. Now instead of "boyfriend", it's "fiance." Soon, that will again change to "husband". This doesn't even include specific descriptions like "student" "employee" "hockey player" or labels of age or appearence. I suspect that we humans have been labelling things for purposes of description since Og first picked up a bone and hit an animal over the head and called it dinner instead of animal. Just my 2 cents - interesting conversation though - definite food for thought.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://832890]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (14)
As of 2014-04-17 11:45 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (446 votes), past polls