Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks Bob
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Seeking Best Practices - does your company follow a standard?

by Herkum (Parson)
on May 05, 2010 at 19:23 UTC ( #838559=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Seeking Best Practices - does your company follow a standard?
in thread Seeking Best Practices - does your company follow a standard?

Besides which, running Perl::Critic on old code is going to dishearten folk, not make them happier

Take a look at Test::Perl::Critic::Progressive. It addresses the issue with having to maintain legacy code without it having to fail critic policies. Of course if someone goes in and starts changing that code the test will look at it and fail it if the new code does not support current coding standards.

It is a good bridge between legacy and new code.


Comment on Re^3: Seeking Best Practices - does your company follow a standard?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://838559]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (5)
As of 2014-04-19 18:17 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (483 votes), past polls