Re^2: Inline::Python sucks

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Inline::Python sucks by ikegami (Patriarch) on May 15, 2010 at 00:05 UTC
there should be some people verifying all CPAN modules There are CPAN needs some filtering Filtering? No. That would prevent anyone from using it because it doesn't work in your environment. And you got told it wouldn't work in your environment by the installer before it even got installed (in the form of failed tests), so it's not like your time got wasted. Maybe the search tools could be improved, though. Any suggestions?	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re^3: Inline::Python sucks by LanX (Saint) on May 14, 2010 at 23:57 UTC
there should be some people verifying all CPAN modules ... I support your idea ... ...for the beginning there should be some people verifying all postings of Anonymous Monks by hand and deciding if they go in or in a waiting queue. The monastery needs some filtering , otherwise it's going to turn into a big lake of tr*lls! Cheers Rolf 8)	[reply]
Re^4: Inline::Python sucks by Anonymous Monk on May 15, 2010 at 00:41 UTC
this is already present for perlmonks, now let's see it for CPAN	[reply]
Re^3: Inline::Python sucks by JavaFan (Canon) on May 15, 2010 at 15:41 UTC
CPAN needs some filtering No, it doesn't. CPAN is just a distribution mechanism, nothing more, nothing less. And because it's nothing more than a distribution mechanism, anyone can build something on top of it. If you think it's worthwhile to have a filtering system: build one.	[reply]


P is for Practical
	PerlMonks