Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks DiBona
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Object framework for a *::Tiny module

by zby (Vicar)
on May 19, 2010 at 18:43 UTC ( #840760=perlquestion: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??
zby has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

I know there can never be an ultimate and objective answer for this question - but at least I hope to learn what is the popular choice here. I cannot decide myself what to choose for WebNano so please help me. The important point is that I try to subscribe to the ::Tiny way of doing things with this module so this question is really a poll aimed at people that care for these kind of modules.

Right now I am hesitating between Any::Moose and Class::XSAccessors with the following pros and cons.

Pro Any::Moose

  1. Possibly no XS
  2. Can mean Moose for those that like to use Moose extended features

Pro Class::XSAccessors

  1. Very fast
  2. Small
  3. With MooseX::NonMoose can also be extended to Moose with no hassle at all
  4. Used by Alias
What do you think?

Comment on Object framework for a *::Tiny module
Re: Object framework for a *::Tiny module
by ctilmes (Priest) on May 19, 2010 at 21:02 UTC
    Object::Simple because it is, well, simple. It fits in well with the ::Tiny model you are looking for.
Re: Object framework for a *::Tiny module
by DrHyde (Prior) on May 20, 2010 at 10:07 UTC
    If you want to be ::Tiny, you shouldn't use either of 'em. See http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.datetime/2007/01/msg6584.html.
      Thanks - that was informative. But I think I cannot afford this level of ::Tiny, it's more in the direction of ::Tiny as much as I can, but not really entering the competition :) For my defence Template::Tiny is neither completely dependencies free.
Re: Object framework for a *::Tiny module
by BioLion (Curate) on May 20, 2010 at 11:47 UTC

    This is probably a naive question, but does Tiny (maximal code usage density?) bear any relation to Lite (minimal memory load?)? Does one come at the expense of the other?

    I only ask because generally I work to Lite principals, because I am usually memory limited rather than processor limited, however my code usually ends up pretty minimal too, so i am just wondering if this is just me, or whether the two themes are related?

    I should add that I don't check my code usage usually, and though I try to pack in functionality, I am aware that small doesn't always equal beautiful...

    Just a something something...
      Interesting question - I would like to see some discussion about it between the more knowledgeable than me :) Maybe you could ask that question at Alias's blog?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: perlquestion [id://840760]
Approved by herveus
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (4)
As of 2014-04-20 03:56 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (485 votes), past polls