Let me summarize the key points that I see. Your opinion was that anonymous monk ruined the whole idea of Perlmonks. Yet Perlmonks is here, clearly works, and has anonymous monks. Furthermore some of the people who have been part of making it work have expressed the opinion that the existence of anonymous monk is part of what makes it work.
My question for you is this. You have come to accept that your original take on Perlmonks was wrong. Do you care to challenge your beliefs about why it works?
